This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
jnl:ghanem2016 [2019/05/02 08:07] admin |
jnl:ghanem2016 [2020/05/15 05:43] (current) admin [Commentary] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | {{: | ||
====Commentary==== | ====Commentary==== | ||
===Key=== | ===Key=== | ||
* Good: low-fi, can differentiate expert/ | * Good: low-fi, can differentiate expert/ | ||
* Bad: manual ? inter-rater?; | * Bad: manual ? inter-rater?; | ||
+ | * need an expert to do it | ||
===Assessment Model=== | ===Assessment Model=== | ||
* Outcome only | * Outcome only | ||
+ | * Assessor score. Bias, rating, score - [[ac: | ||
+ | * Weighting - each error given equal weight -- is that really the case? see [[bk: | ||
+ | * Experts: also made errors (between 2-2.5 errors); do they make different errors? | ||
* Size of rat aorta? | * Size of rat aorta? | ||
* Can differentiate expert, but how does it correlate with patency? | * Can differentiate expert, but how does it correlate with patency? | ||
===Methodology=== | ===Methodology=== | ||
- | * 29 participants with 1 anastomosis each on day 3 and day 5; 2 experts with 3 anastomosis on D3 and 1 on D4 | + | * 29 participants with 2 anastomosis each on day 3 and day 5; 2 experts with 3 anastomosis on D1 and 3 on D3 |
* " | * " | ||
* SD for expert group higher (2.5) vs (1.0-1.3) for other groups --> there is some variability anastomosis to anastomosis | * SD for expert group higher (2.5) vs (1.0-1.3) for other groups --> there is some variability anastomosis to anastomosis | ||
Line 34: | Line 39: | ||
===Discussion=== | ===Discussion=== | ||
- | The authors quote Kaufman (whom I assume takes from Fitts-Posner), | + | The authors quote [[jnl: |
===So What?=== | ===So What?=== |