User Tools

Site Tools


jnl:ghanem2016

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
jnl:ghanem2016 [2019/05/02 08:52]
admin
jnl:ghanem2016 [2020/05/15 05:43] (current)
admin [Commentary]
Line 22: Line 22:
   * Good: low-fi, can differentiate expert/novice   * Good: low-fi, can differentiate expert/novice
   * Bad: manual ? inter-rater?; how does it correlate with real micro skills?   * Bad: manual ? inter-rater?; how does it correlate with real micro skills?
 +    * need an expert to do it
  
 ===Assessment Model=== ===Assessment Model===
   * Outcome only   * Outcome only
-  * Weighting - each error given equal weight -- is that really the case? see [[bk:bland1991|Bland]] page 14 on Scores.+  * Assessor score. Bias, rating, score - [[ac:stats:scores|statistical considerations]] 
 +  * Weighting - each error given equal weight -- is that really the case? see [[bk:altman1991|Altman]] page 14 on Scores.
     * Experts: also made errors (between 2-2.5 errors); do they make different errors?     * Experts: also made errors (between 2-2.5 errors); do they make different errors?
   * Size of rat aorta?   * Size of rat aorta?
Line 31: Line 33:
  
 ===Methodology=== ===Methodology===
-  * 29 participants with 2 anastomosis each on day 3 and day 5; 2 experts with 3 anastomosis on D3 and on D4+  * 29 participants with 2 anastomosis each on day 3 and day 5; 2 experts with 3 anastomosis on D1 and on D3
     * "expert" group very concentrated     * "expert" group very concentrated
   * SD for expert group higher (2.5) vs (1.0-1.3) for other groups --> there is some variability anastomosis to anastomosis   * SD for expert group higher (2.5) vs (1.0-1.3) for other groups --> there is some variability anastomosis to anastomosis
jnl/ghanem2016.1556787130.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/03/24 02:34 (external edit)