jnl:ghanem2016
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
jnl:ghanem2016 [2020/03/24 02:34] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
jnl:ghanem2016 [2020/05/15 05:43] (current) admin [Commentary] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| * Good: low-fi, can differentiate expert/ | * Good: low-fi, can differentiate expert/ | ||
| * Bad: manual ? inter-rater?; | * Bad: manual ? inter-rater?; | ||
| + | * need an expert to do it | ||
| ===Assessment Model=== | ===Assessment Model=== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
| ===Methodology=== | ===Methodology=== | ||
| - | * 29 participants with 2 anastomosis each on day 3 and day 5; 2 experts with 3 anastomosis on D3 and 1 on D4 | + | * 29 participants with 2 anastomosis each on day 3 and day 5; 2 experts with 3 anastomosis on D1 and 3 on D3 |
| * " | * " | ||
| * SD for expert group higher (2.5) vs (1.0-1.3) for other groups --> there is some variability anastomosis to anastomosis | * SD for expert group higher (2.5) vs (1.0-1.3) for other groups --> there is some variability anastomosis to anastomosis | ||
jnl/ghanem2016.1585017260.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/03/24 02:34 by 127.0.0.1
Page Tools
