Alphonsus Chong's Personal Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision 		Previous revision
jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing [2021/07/20 13:02]
admin created 		jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing [2021/08/28 13:11] (current)
admin [See also]
Line 21: Line 21:
     * systematic review: a priori questions     * systematic review: a priori questions
     * meta-analysis: statistical methods ΓÇô> forest plot; "mathematical assimilation of studies"     * meta-analysis: statistical methods ΓÇô> forest plot; "mathematical assimilation of studies"
-    * QUORUM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses) -> PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) +    * QUORUM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses) -> [[http://www.prisma-statement.org/|PRISMA]] (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) 
-    * EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Care Research)+    * [[https://www.equator-network.org/|EQUATOR]] (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Care Research)
  
 ==== Getting Started ==== ==== Getting Started ====
  
-  * Check registries to avoid duplication: e.g. PROSPERO+=== Before === 
 +  - **Check registries** to avoid duplication: e.g. PROSPERO
     * What does this review answer that previous ones did not?     * What does this review answer that previous ones did not?
-  * Answer an answerable question - important, underreported +  - Answer an **answerable question** - important, underreported 
-    * balance between too broad and too narrow - use PICOS criteria (Participants, intervention, comparisons, outcomes, study design)+    * balance between too broad and too narrow - use [[https://libguides.murdoch.edu.au/systematic/PICO|PICOS]] criteria (Participants, intervention, comparisons, outcomes, study design)
     * may need to adjust criteria e.g. hip replacement outcomes     * may need to adjust criteria e.g. hip replacement outcomes
-  * Critical evaluation of eligible studies for "best available evidence"+ 
 +=== Determine eligibility and outcomes === 
 +  - Critical **evaluation of eligible studies** for "best available evidence"
     * Level 1 studies of course great, but not always available or possible e.g. compartment syndrome     * Level 1 studies of course great, but not always available or possible e.g. compartment syndrome
-  * primary study outcomes determined a priori +  - primary **study outcomes** determined a priori 
-  * Search methodology and documenting it in a PRISMA flowchart+ 
 +=== Search, collect and extract === 
 +  - **Search methodology** and documenting it in a [[http://www.prisma-statement.org/|PRISMA]] flowchart
     * Besides MEDLINE/PubMed; EMbase, PEDro, Cochrane, CENTRAL, SciVerse SCopus, CINAHL, SPORTDIscus, Google Scholar     * Besides MEDLINE/PubMed; EMbase, PEDro, Cochrane, CENTRAL, SciVerse SCopus, CINAHL, SPORTDIscus, Google Scholar
-  * Review lists +  - **Review lists** 
-  * Extract data from studies using checklists: CEBM, Cochrane collaboration ΓÇô> Excel +  - **Extract data** from studies using checklists: CEBM, Cochrane collaboration ΓÇô> Excel 
-  * Data analysis:+ 
 +=== Analyze, grade and summarize=== 
 +  - **Data analysis**:
     * beware heterogeneity     * beware heterogeneity
     * "eyeball test"; Cochrane Q test, index test or T2 test.     * "eyeball test"; Cochrane Q test, index test or T2 test.
-  * Grade evidence and strength of recomendations (SORT - Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) +  - **Grade evidence** and strength of recomendations ([[https://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0201/p548.html|SORT]] - Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, [[https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/|GRADE]]: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) 
-  * AMSTAR (to grade systematic reviews); MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews) +  - AMSTAR (to grade systematic reviews); MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews) 
-  * Summarize the take home message well+  - **Summarize** the take home message well
  
 +==== See also ====
 +
 +  - [[https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71 | 2020 PRISMA statement described in BMJ]]
 +  - EQUATOR provides a lot of resources for research including a checklist for case reports[[https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/care/|CARE]]
 ==== Source ==== ==== Source ====
  
 Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A., & Flanigan, D. C. (2014). How to Write a Systematic Review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(11), 2761ΓÇô2768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513497567 Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A., & Flanigan, D. C. (2014). How to Write a Systematic Review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(11), 2761ΓÇô2768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513497567
 +
  
 ==== Metadata ==== ==== Metadata ====
jnl/harris2014_systematic_review_writing.1626786166.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/07/20 13:02 by admin

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki