This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing [2021/07/25 12:26] admin |
jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing [2021/08/28 13:11] (current) admin [See also] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| * systematic review: a priori questions | * systematic review: a priori questions | ||
| * meta-analysis: | * meta-analysis: | ||
| - | * QUORUM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses) -> PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) | + | * QUORUM (Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses) -> [[http:// |
| - | * EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Care Research) | + | * [[https:// |
| ==== Getting Started ==== | ==== Getting Started ==== | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| * What does this review answer that previous ones did not? | * What does this review answer that previous ones did not? | ||
| - Answer an **answerable question** - important, underreported | - Answer an **answerable question** - important, underreported | ||
| - | * balance between too broad and too narrow - use PICOS criteria (Participants, | + | * balance between too broad and too narrow - use [[https:// |
| * may need to adjust criteria e.g. hip replacement outcomes | * may need to adjust criteria e.g. hip replacement outcomes | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| === Search, collect and extract === | === Search, collect and extract === | ||
| - | - **Search methodology** and documenting it in a PRISMA flowchart | + | - **Search methodology** and documenting it in a [[http:// |
| * Besides MEDLINE/ | * Besides MEDLINE/ | ||
| - **Review lists** | - **Review lists** | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| * beware heterogeneity | * beware heterogeneity | ||
| * " | * " | ||
| - | - **Grade evidence** and strength of recomendations (SORT - Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) | + | - **Grade evidence** and strength of recomendations ([[https:// |
| - AMSTAR (to grade systematic reviews); MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews) | - AMSTAR (to grade systematic reviews); MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews) | ||
| - **Summarize** the take home message well | - **Summarize** the take home message well | ||
| + | ==== See also ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | - [[https:// | ||
| + | - EQUATOR provides a lot of resources for research including a checklist for case reports[[https:// | ||
| ==== Source ==== | ==== Source ==== | ||
| Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A., & Flanigan, D. C. (2014). How to Write a Systematic Review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(11), 2761ΓÇô2768. https:// | Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A., & Flanigan, D. C. (2014). How to Write a Systematic Review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(11), 2761ΓÇô2768. https:// | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Metadata ==== | ==== Metadata ==== | ||