Alphonsus Chong's Personal Wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing [2021/08/28 12:57]
admin [Introduction] 		jnl:harris2014_systematic_review_writing [2021/08/28 13:11] (current)
admin [See also]
Line 30: Line 30:
     * What does this review answer that previous ones did not?     * What does this review answer that previous ones did not?
   - Answer an **answerable question** - important, underreported   - Answer an **answerable question** - important, underreported
-    * balance between too broad and too narrow - use PICOS criteria (Participants, intervention, comparisons, outcomes, study design)+    * balance between too broad and too narrow - use [[https://libguides.murdoch.edu.au/systematic/PICO|PICOS]] criteria (Participants, intervention, comparisons, outcomes, study design)
     * may need to adjust criteria e.g. hip replacement outcomes     * may need to adjust criteria e.g. hip replacement outcomes
  
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 === Search, collect and extract === === Search, collect and extract ===
-  - **Search methodology** and documenting it in a PRISMA flowchart+  - **Search methodology** and documenting it in a [[http://www.prisma-statement.org/|PRISMA]] flowchart
     * Besides MEDLINE/PubMed; EMbase, PEDro, Cochrane, CENTRAL, SciVerse SCopus, CINAHL, SPORTDIscus, Google Scholar     * Besides MEDLINE/PubMed; EMbase, PEDro, Cochrane, CENTRAL, SciVerse SCopus, CINAHL, SPORTDIscus, Google Scholar
   - **Review lists**   - **Review lists**
Line 48: Line 48:
     * beware heterogeneity     * beware heterogeneity
     * "eyeball test"; Cochrane Q test, index test or T2 test.     * "eyeball test"; Cochrane Q test, index test or T2 test.
-  - **Grade evidence** and strength of recomendations (SORT - Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, GRADE: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)+  - **Grade evidence** and strength of recomendations ([[https://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0201/p548.html|SORT]] - Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy, [[https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/|GRADE]]: Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)
   - AMSTAR (to grade systematic reviews); MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews)   - AMSTAR (to grade systematic reviews); MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews)
   - **Summarize** the take home message well   - **Summarize** the take home message well
Line 55: Line 55:
  
   - [[https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71 | 2020 PRISMA statement described in BMJ]]   - [[https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71 | 2020 PRISMA statement described in BMJ]]
 +  - EQUATOR provides a lot of resources for research including a checklist for case reports[[https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/care/|CARE]]
 ==== Source ==== ==== Source ====
  
jnl/harris2014_systematic_review_writing.1630155470.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2021/08/28 12:57 by admin

Page Tools

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki