User Tools

Site Tools


jnl:rajan2019

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
jnl:rajan2019 [2020/07/31 07:42]
admin [Commentary]
jnl:rajan2019 [2020/07/31 07:44] (current)
admin [Commentary]
Line 22: Line 22:
   - Use of different PGY years as comparison - may not be the best; assumption is that PGY 3 better than 2 better than 1   - Use of different PGY years as comparison - may not be the best; assumption is that PGY 3 better than 2 better than 1
   - very small n for each group in PGY   - very small n for each group in PGY
-  - Inter-rater reliability seems better than intra-rater (time interval?)+  - Inter-rater reliability seems better than intra-rater (time interval?- //perhaps training the assessors would help//
   - [[ac:UWOMSA]] anastomosis module only 0.53-0.56 R^2   - [[ac:UWOMSA]] anastomosis module only 0.53-0.56 R^2
   - no data spread shown - only mean scores   - no data spread shown - only mean scores
   - [[ac:UWOMSA]] with GRS - R2 is 0.71-0.74   - [[ac:UWOMSA]] with GRS - R2 is 0.71-0.74
-  - Strangely enough, the authors recommend [[ac:UWOMSA]], although GRS seems to have better intra- and inter-rater reliability. Perhaps it is because as a tool to provide feedback, it is not useful. That is a weakness of global/ generic type scoring systems.+  - Strangely enough, the authors recommend [[ac:UWOMSA]], although GRS seems to have better intra- and inter-rater reliability. Perhaps this is becauseas a tool to provide feedback, it is not useful. That is a weakness of global/ generic type scoring systems.
  
 ====Source===== ====Source=====
jnl/rajan2019.1596181343.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/07/31 07:42 by admin