This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
jnl:tangjb_2013_flexor_tendon_results [2021/10/15 13:53] admin created |
jnl:tangjb_2013_flexor_tendon_results [2021/10/15 13:55] (current) admin |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
- TAM | - TAM | ||
- | As Teemu points out, flexor tendon scoring systems turn a quantitative measure (AROM) into a qualitative one. There is lack of consensus for what is excellent: this paper suggests the original Strickland and Strickland-Glogovac is too lenient, and raises the bar for excellence (90% TAM, and adding a " | + | As Teemu [[jnl: |
Tang also discusses the expertise of the person doing the surgery, as well as reporting of injury by subzones. | Tang also discusses the expertise of the person doing the surgery, as well as reporting of injury by subzones. | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
===== See also ===== | ===== See also ===== | ||
- | * Teemu' | + | * [[jnl: |
* Flexor tendon healing | * Flexor tendon healing | ||
* Hardwicke, J. T., Tan, J. J., Foster, M. A., & Titley, O. G. (2014). A Systematic Review of 2-Strand Versus Multistrand Core Suture Techniques and Functional Outcome After Digital Flexor Tendon Repair. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 39(4), 686-695.e2. https:// | * Hardwicke, J. T., Tan, J. J., Foster, M. A., & Titley, O. G. (2014). A Systematic Review of 2-Strand Versus Multistrand Core Suture Techniques and Functional Outcome After Digital Flexor Tendon Repair. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 39(4), 686-695.e2. https:// |