This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
md:secondary_surgery_trauma [2020/08/08 03:05] admin |
md:secondary_surgery_trauma [2020/08/11 09:27] (current) admin [Replantation] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Introduction==== | ====Introduction==== | ||
- | I started this section as preparation work for a talk at a 2020 ASSH Meeting precourse. | + | ===Classification of secondary surgery=== |
+ | from [[jnl: | ||
+ | * repair of structures not primarily repaired | ||
+ | * promote healing/ | ||
+ | * enhance function - arthrodesis, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Replantation ==== | ||
+ | * [[jnl: | ||
+ | * Rate of secondary surgery in replantation is high, and may be multiple | ||
+ | * In replantation - try to do everything primarily -- hard to comeback to do secondary recon | ||
+ | * Timing - 3 months - supple skin -- can be delayed by wound problems; junction of native and flap skin is issue for tendon grafts. | ||
+ | * Flexion more important than extension | ||
+ | * Jupiter - good results with tenolysis in replantation 72 degrees to 130 degrees; Yu 119-159 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Cases==== | ||
+ | 25 Female MVA | ||
+ | Initial treatment at a different hospital - external fixation and debridement; | ||
+ | - overall goal - preserve upper limb and maximise function of hand and upper limb | ||
+ | |||
+ | D0: debridement and external fixation --> infection | ||
+ | D7-30+: multiple debridements, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Secondary procedures | ||
+ | - 7 months: Restore passive motion of forearm and digits before tendon transfer --> take down of radioulnar synostosis, MCPJ captulectomy, | ||
+ | - 9 months: tendon transfers - IF FDS to FPL, MF FDS to IF & MF FDP, RF FDS to RF & SF FDP | ||
+ | - complicated by recurrence of HO -- 11 months: re-excision of HO & release of contracture; | ||
+ | - 19 months: MF, RF, SF captulectomy, | ||
+ | - outstanding issues: loss of supination | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Psychological adaptation==== | ||
+ | * Bradway and Malone | ||
+ | * Limited information - UE only < 10% of all amputations | ||
+ | * psychiatric intervention needed only for minority | ||
+ | * Stages | ||
+ | * preop - anticipation/ | ||
+ | * immediate postop - early acceptance not necessarily good, more optimism in life threatening ijuries | ||
+ | * with rehabilitation - denial | ||
+ | * at home - critical phase; learn to adapt or stuck in denial | ||
+ | * Guidelines in managing | ||
+ | * start pre-op | ||
+ | * Amputation as a " | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Alternatives to secondary reconstruction==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[jnl: | ||
+ | * early fitting better results | ||
+ | * compare with [[jnl: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
====Options==== | ====Options==== | ||
===Pollicization=== | ===Pollicization=== | ||
[[md: | [[md: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * used less in microsurgical age | ||
+ | * may be best option | ||
+ | * nearer to CMCJ | ||
+ | * disadvantages | ||
+ | * sensation - still IF | ||
+ | * loss of digit | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Planning == | ||
+ | * IF by far most common - but can use other digits | ||
+ | * consider if injured other digits | ||
+ | | ||
+ | Binhammer and Lister' | ||
+ | * tendon transfer for opposition - FDS RF | ||
+ | * Fixation | ||
+ | * shortening - distally or proximally -- ? length | ||
+ | * check circulation | ||
===Thumb lengthening=== | ===Thumb lengthening=== | ||
+ | |||
Ivan Matev' | Ivan Matev' | ||
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
- | | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Osteoplastic thumb reconstruction== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * flap - groin/ | ||
+ | * size: 6-7 cm | ||
+ | * 1-2 cm shortening | ||
+ | * avoid circular seam - either oval or zig-zag | ||
+ | * seam in palmar side of " | ||
+ | |||
+ | * bone - iliac crest, tibia, radius | ||
+ | * make thumb slightly shorter than other side | ||
+ | * bone fixation --> wedge into MC/P1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * neurovascular island flap - ulnar side of MF | ||
+ | * ulnar side of RF | ||
+ | * make sure it is big enough | ||
+ | |||
+ | * nerve repair | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Staging - 3 vs 2 vs 1 stage | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Issues== | ||
+ | * sensory recovery | ||
+ | * flap necrosis | ||
+ | * bone graft resorption - related to flap | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Outcomes in mutilating hand injuries ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * see [[jnl: | ||
+ | * MSK Trauma big burden -- especially developing countries | ||
+ | * need for outcome measures -- move towards PROMs | ||
+ | * PROMs context specific -- different countries and cultures --> different | ||
+ | * disability vs impairment -- measures don't map well | ||
+ | * different PROMs don't correlate well too | ||
+ | * individualized treatment - need shared decision making | ||
====References==== | ====References==== | ||
Line 24: | Line 130: | ||
- Brown, P. W. (1982). Less than ten—Surgeons with amputated fingers. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 7(1), 31–37. https:// | - Brown, P. W. (1982). Less than ten—Surgeons with amputated fingers. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 7(1), 31–37. https:// | ||
- Cheung, K., Hatchell, A., & Thoma, A. (2013). Approach to traumatic hand injuries for primary care physicians. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, 59(6), 614–618. | - Cheung, K., Hatchell, A., & Thoma, A. (2013). Approach to traumatic hand injuries for primary care physicians. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, 59(6), 614–618. | ||
+ | - Chevrier, J. M., Gingras, G., Lemieux, R., Mongeau, M., Susset, V., & Voyer, R. (1956). [[jnl: | ||
- Foo, A., & Sebastin, S. J. (2016). Secondary Interventions for Mutilating Hand Injuries. Hand Clinics, 32(4), 555–567. https:// | - Foo, A., & Sebastin, S. J. (2016). Secondary Interventions for Mutilating Hand Injuries. Hand Clinics, 32(4), 555–567. https:// | ||
- Foucher, G. (1997). Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. Martin Dunitz. | - Foucher, G. (1997). Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. Martin Dunitz. | ||
- | - Giladi, A. M., Ranganathan, | + | - Giladi, A. M., Ranganathan, |
- | - Gingras, G., & Lemieux, R. (1956). PSYCHO-SOCIAL AND REHABILITATIVE ASPECTS OF UPPER EXTREMITY AMPUTEES. 75, 5. | + | |
- [[jnl: | - [[jnl: | ||
- How to use the ICF: A Practical Manual for using the International CLassification of Functioning, | - How to use the ICF: A Practical Manual for using the International CLassification of Functioning, | ||
- Krueger, C. A., Wenke, J. C., Cho, M. S., & Hsu, J. R. (2014). Common Factors and Outcome in Late Upper Extremity Amputations After Military Injury: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 28(4), 227–231. https:// | - Krueger, C. A., Wenke, J. C., Cho, M. S., & Hsu, J. R. (2014). Common Factors and Outcome in Late Upper Extremity Amputations After Military Injury: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 28(4), 227–231. https:// | ||
+ | - Pinzur, M. S., Angelats, J., Light, T. R., Izuierdo, R., & Pluth, T. (1994). [[jnl: | ||
+ | - Sabapathy, S. R., & Bhardwaj, P. (2013). [[jnl: | ||
- Swiontkowksi, | - Swiontkowksi, | ||
- | - [[jnl: | + | - [[jnl: |
+ | |||
+ | ==== History ==== | ||
+ | * 2020-07-30 I started this section as preparation work for a talk at a 2020 ASSH Meeting pre-course. | ||
+ | * 2020-08-08 Combined with notes.rst and rearranged sections |