User Tools

Site Tools


jnl:hobart2009

This is an old revision of the document!


Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods.

New psychometric methods

Rasch measurement vs Item response theory

Traditional psychometric methods

  1. psychometric – originally psychology but now broadened
  2. psychometric: methods for developing and evaluating rating scales, and for analyzing their data

Rating scales

  1. for properties that we can't measure directly e.g. happiness, disability (vs weight)
  2. latent traits – “inferred variabllle” = aka 'property', 'trait', 'concept', 'aspect'
  3. Dichotomous (RMI) vs polytomous (3 or more)
  4. Direct also opposite RMI vs MSIS-29

Evaluation of a rating scale

 " extent to which a quantitative conceptualization has been operationalized successfully "
  1. Traditional 3: reliability, validity, responsiveness
  2. Hobart 6:
  • Data quality
  • scaling (assumptions)
  • targetting
  • reliability
  • validity
  • responsiveness

Classical Test Theory (Assumptions x 5) & limitations

  1. Weak true core theory
  2. 'weak assumptions leads to weak conclusions'

Limitations of traditional psychometric methods

  1. ordered counts are not interval measures
  2. results for scales are sample dependent (therefore unstable)
  3. results for samples are scale dependent
  4. missing data
  5. SEM
  6. scaling

Source

Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta13120

Meta

  1. created: 2021-03-11
jnl/hobart2009.1615554348.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/03/12 13:05 by admin