User Tools

Site Tools


jnl:yu2003

Secondary procedures following digital replantation and revascularisation

Abstract

In this retrospective study, 79 digits of 55 patients received 102 secondary procedures following replantation. We divided the procedures into two groups, occurring before or after 2 months following replantation. The procedures in the early group were mainly for soft tissue coverage (92%), and those in that late group were mainly for tendon (67%) to improve function. Factors associated with higher incidence of early secondary procedures included multiple-finger injury, avulsion or degloving injury and level of injury proximal to zone III in finger replantation ðp , 0:05Þ: However, younger patients and those with proximal level replantation in fingers had more late secondary procedures ðp , 0:05Þ: Flexor tenolysis procedure significantly improved the digital function after replantation ðp , 0:05Þ: q 2003

Commentary

Definition of secondary procedures

  • describes exploration and revision of vascular anastomosis as secondary procedures

Classification

  • Early < 2 months – mainly soft tissue coverage
  • Late > 2 months – tendon

Numbers

  • 79 digits, 55 patients, 102 secondary procedures
  • 32% had secondary procedures; range from 1-4 procedures: 1:22, 2: 21, 3: 10, 4: 2

When to do tenolysis after replantation?

  • Yu advocates are 6 months
  • quotes Jupiter 4-6 months

Results of tenolysis after replantation

  • Tamai score improve 67-84
  • no worse
  • no digit loss

Source

Yu, J.-C., Shieh, S.-J., Lee, J.-W., Hsu, H.-Y., & Chiu, H.-Y. (2003). Secondary procedures following digital replantation and revascularisation. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 56(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00033-X

See also

History

  • 2020-07-13 created as .txt
  • 2020-08-08 transcribed to dokuwiki and minor additions
jnl/yu2003.txt · Last modified: 2020/08/08 03:22 by admin