User Tools

Site Tools


md:secondary_surgery_trauma

This is an old revision of the document!


Secondary Surgery after Extremity Trauma

Introduction

Classification of secondary surgery

  • repair of structures not primarily repaired
  • promote healing/enhance function e.g. malunion, nonunion, tenolysis
  • enhance function - arthrodesis, bone lengthening, tendon transfers etc.

{where is this definition from?}

Replantation

    • Rate of secondary surgery in replantation is high, and may be multiple
    • In replantation - try to do everything primarily – hard to comeback to do secondary recon
    • Timing - 3 months - supple skin – can be delayed by wound problems; junction of native and flap skin is issue for tendon grafts.
    • Flexion more important than extension
    • Jupiter - good results with tenolysis in replantation 72 degrees to 130 degrees; Yu 119-159

Cases

25 Female MVA Initial treatment at a different hospital - external fixation and debridement; came infected - overall goal - preserve upper limb and maximise function of hand and upper limb

D0: debridement and external fixation –> infection D7-30+: multiple debridements, shortening, fixation with plates and screws

Secondary procedures - 7 months: Restore passive motion of forearm and digits before tendon transfer –> take down of radioulnar synostosis, MCPJ captulectomy, removal of radial plates - 9 months: tendon transfers - IF FDS to FPL, MF FDS to IF & MF FDP, RF FDS to RF & SF FDP - complicated by recurrence of HO – 11 months: re-excision of HO & release of contracture; FFMT gracilis for finger extension - 19 months: MF, RF, SF captulectomy, arthrolysis, scar revision - outstanding issues: loss of supination

Psychological adaptation

  • Bradway and Malone
  • Limited information - UE only < 10% of all amputations
  • psychiatric intervention needed only for minority
  • Stages
    • preop - anticipation/ grief
    • immediate postop - early acceptance not necessarily good, more optimism in life threatening ijuries
    • with rehabilitation - denial
    • at home - critical phase; learn to adapt or stuck in denial
  • Guidelines in managing
    • start pre-op
    • Amputation as a “reconstructive” procedure

Alternatives to secondary reconstruction

Options

Pollicization

Pollicization

Pollicization

used less in microsurgical age - may be best option

  1. nearer to CMCJ
  2. disadvantages
    1. sensation - still IF
  3. loss of digit

Planning - IF by far most common - but can use other digits

  1. consider if injured other digits

Binhammer and Lister's article is quite good - tendon transfer for opposition - FDS RF - Fixation - shortening - distally or proximally – ? length - check circulation -

Thumb lengthening

Ivan Matev's chapter in Foucher's book:

  1. 50% easy, 80% possible, sometimes 100% in young
  2. young - slower (1mm /d) but more lengthening
  3. older - more likely bone graft (45-60 days) if no good callus - in situ
  4. problems - union, angulation, infection, MCPJ flexion
  5. need good skin first
  6. can pain nail
  7. make sure CMCJ is good, skin at tip is good first, sometimes need to deepen/widen web

################################## Osteoplastic thumb reconstruction ##################################

## flap - groin/abdominal vs radial forearm

  1. size: 6-7 cm
  2. 1-2 cm shortening
  3. avoid circular seam - either oval or zig-zag
  4. seam in palmar side of “thumb”

## bone - iliac crest, tibia, radius

  1. make thumb slightly shorter than other side
  2. bone fixation –> wedge into MC/P1

## neurovascular island flap - ulnar side of MF

  1. ulnar side of RF
  2. make sure it is big enough

## nerve repair +/-

- Staging - 3 vs 2 vs 1 stage

Issues - sensory recovery - flap necrosis - bone graft resorption - related to flap

Outcomes in mutilating hand injuries

  • MSK Trauma big burden – especially developing countries
    • need for outcome measures – move towards PROMs
  • PROMs context specific – different countries and cultures –> different
  • disability vs impairment – measures don't map well
  • different PROMs don't correlate well too
  • individualized treatment - need shared decision making

References

  1. Bradway, J. K., Malone, J. M., Racy, J., Leal, J. M., & Poole, J. (n.d.). Psychological Adaptation to Amputation: An Overview. 5.
  2. Brown, P. W. (1982). Less than ten—Surgeons with amputated fingers. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 7(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(82)80010-5
  3. Cheung, K., Hatchell, A., & Thoma, A. (2013). Approach to traumatic hand injuries for primary care physicians. Canadian Family Physician Medecin De Famille Canadien, 59(6), 614–618.
  4. Foo, A., & Sebastin, S. J. (2016). Secondary Interventions for Mutilating Hand Injuries. Hand Clinics, 32(4), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2016.07.006
  5. Foucher, G. (1997). Reconstructive surgery in hand mutilation. Martin Dunitz.
  6. Giladi, A. M., Ranganathan, K., & Chung, K. C. (2016). Measuring Functional and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment of Mutilating Hand Injuries. Hand Clinics, 32(4), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2016.06.002
  7. Gingras, G., & Lemieux, R. (1956). PSYCHO-SOCIAL AND REHABILITATIVE ASPECTS OF UPPER EXTREMITY AMPUTEES. 75, 5.
  8. Graham, D., Bhardwaj, P., & Sabapathy, S. R. (2016). Secondary Thumb Reconstruction in a Mutilated Hand. Hand Clinics, 32(4), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2016.07.005
  9. How to use the ICF: A Practical Manual for using the International CLassification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). (2013). WHO.
  10. Krueger, C. A., Wenke, J. C., Cho, M. S., & Hsu, J. R. (2014). Common Factors and Outcome in Late Upper Extremity Amputations After Military Injury: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 28(4), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182a665f5
  11. Pinzur, M. S., Angelats, J., Light, T. R., Izuierdo, R., & Pluth, T. (1994). Functional outcome following traumatic upper limb amputation and prosthetic limb fitting. The Journal of Hand Surgery, 19(5), 836–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(94)90197-X
  12. Sabapathy, S. R., & Bhardwaj, P. (2013). Secondary procedures in replantation. Seminars in Plastic Surgery, 27(4), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360587
  13. Swiontkowksi, M. F. (2011a). Traumatic and Trauma-Related Amputations: Part I: General Principles and Lower-Extremity Amputations. Yearbook of Orthopedics, 2011, 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yort.2011.04.016
  14. Yu, J.-C., Shieh, S.-J., Lee, J.-W., Hsu, H.-Y., & Chiu, H.-Y. (2003). Secondary procedures following digital replantation and revascularisation. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 56(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(03)00033-X

History

  • 2020-07-30 I started this section as preparation work for a talk at a 2020 ASSH Meeting pre-course.
  • 2020-08-08 Combined with notes.rst and rearranged sections
md/secondary_surgery_trauma.1596859068.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/08/08 03:57 by admin